Influence of Marxist historiography on Indian history writing. Gilbert Lalthazuala Roll.no:558

Marxist or historical materialist historiography is a school of historiography influenced by Marxism. The chief tenets of Marxist historiography are the centrality of social class and economic constraints in determining historical outcomes.

Marxist historiography has made contributions to the history of the working class, oppressed nationalities, and the methodology of history from below.

Marxist historiography, that is, the writing of Marxist history in line with the given historiographical principles, is generally seen as a tool. Its aim is to bring those oppressed by history to self-consciousness, and to arm them with tactics and strategies from history: it is both a historical and a liberatory project.

Historians who use Marxist methodology, but disagree with the mainstream of Marxism, often describe themselves as marxist historians (with a lowercase M). Methods from Marxist historiography, such as class analysis, can be divorced from the liberatory intent of Marxist historiography; such practitioners often refer to their work as marxian or Marxian.

In the study of early India, there are several historians working with Marxian methods.

R.S. Sharma, Romila Thapar, D.N. Jha, B.D. Chattopadhyay and Kumkum Roy are

some of them. Their researches have enriched our understanding of ancient India.

The Marxist historians have contributed enormously to Indian historiography. In all

field of Indian history, whether we divide it by periods or by topics, the Marxist historians

have made significant contributions. In several areas, their works have changed the

course of historiography. The Marxist historians do not form a monolithic bloc.

There are wide divergences of views among the Marxist historians. However, there are certain common elements among them.

The history of the dynasties was replaced by the history of the common people. More

emphasis was now given to the study of economy and society in preference to the

political history. The study of broad social and economic systems such as feudalism

and colonialism were undertaken and the social, economic and political changes were

considered not in the light of the actions of individual statesmen, but in terms of the

working out of economy and conflicts between classes.At the level of methodology,

Kosambi’s works introduced an interdisciplinary approach to history which

encompassed literature, archaeology, linguistics, anthropology, numismatics and statistics.

Moreover, the Marxist historiography has made interpretation and explanation more

important than narration or description.

TRANSLATION

Marxist historiography kan tih chu historiography emaw history ziah dan chi hrang hrang zing a pakhat,Karl Marx a zirtirna in a nghawng ani a.Marxist historiography thurin bulpui ber chu vantlang pawl leh economy a khuahkhirhna atanga history lam thil a rahchhuak awm apiang lo hriat chian tum hi ani.

Marxist historiography chuan hnam hnuaihnung zawk te leh mipui vantlang te history zirna leh ziahna ah a thawh hlawk hle a,heng mi te history thlir dan leh hmuh dan min hriattir bawk ani.

Marxist historiography in a tum ber chu history hmang a nekchep a awm te chawikan leh remhriatna a thuam hi ani,marxist historiography chu history lam thil a nih rualin in chhuah zalenna tura ruahmanna pawh ani thei ani.

Historian thenkhat Marx-a thlirna hmang tho si,mahse Marxism thurin nawlpui ring silo an awm a,heng ho hian marxist historians ('M' té an hmang) an inti kher ani.Marxist historiography hrang hrang a class analysis chauh an hmang a,an kuthnu emaw kutchhuak emaw te chu marxian tiin emaw Marxian an ti bawk thin.

India history zir zingah historian thenkhat Marxian method hmang an awm nual a chung te chu R.S.Sharma ,Romila Thapar,D.N.Jha,B.D.Chattopadhyay leh Kumkum Roy te an ni a,an thil zir tam tak te hian hmasang India chanchin chungchang kan hriatna nasa takin an tipung ani.

Marxist historian te hian Indian history ziahna ah an thawh hlawk em em a,Indian history hi a hunbi ang zawngin emaw a thupui ang zawng pawhin then hrang mah ila Marxist historian te thawh hlawk zia kan hmu tho tho a,hmun thenkhat ah phei chuan an hnathawh te avanga history ziah dan lo danglam ta te pawh hmuh tur a awm nawk.Marxist historian te hian rindan pakhat chauh kalpui lovin thlirna tlang hrang hrang atangin thil an thlir zawk a amaherawhchu hetih rual hian an hnathawhah thil inang tak tak a awm bawk.

Heng Marxist historian te zarah tunhmaa lal ram chanchin kan lo zir thin te chu mipui mimir chanchin in alo in thlak ta a,political history zirna chu economy leh society zirna in alo thlak ta bawk a.Kosami chuan interdisciplinary approach rawn ching chhuak in history chu literature,archaeology,linguistics,anthropology,numismatics leh statistics te nen a rawn in kungkaih tir a,tin Marxist historiography hian history chu thawnthu anga an sawi thin aiin a awmze diktak hrilhfiah a dah pawimawh zawk bawk ani.

References:

(i)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_historiography

(ii)MHI-03 Historiography,IGNOU,MA Text Book

SUBALTERN : T. Vanlalruati Roll No. 567

 The term ‘subaltern’ has a rather long history. It was initially applied to the serfs and peasants in England during the Middle Ages. Later, by 1700, it was used for the subordinate ranks in the military. It, however, gained wide currency in scholarly circles after the works of Antonio Gramsci (1891-1937), an Italian Marxist and Communist Party leader. Gramsci generally used the term in a broader connotation of ‘class’ to avoid the censorship of the prison authorities as he was in jail and his writings were scanned. Gramsci had adopted the term to refer to the subordinate groups in the society.

In his opinion, the history of the subaltern groups is almost always related to that of the

ruling groups. In addition, this history is generally ‘fragmentary and episodic’.

Ranajit Guha, however, in the Preface to Subaltern Studies I, did not mention Gramsci’s

use of the term, even though he referred to Gramsci as an inspiration. Instead, he defined

it as given in the Concise Oxford Dictionary:

‘The word “subaltern” in the title stands for the meaning as given in the Concise

Oxford Dictionary, that is, “of inferior rank”.For example, it will be used in as a name for the general attribute of subordination in South Asian society whether this is expressed in terms of class, caste, age, gender and office or in any other way.’

A little later, at the end of his opening essay in the volume, he further clarified this term:

‘The terms “people” and “subaltern classes” have been used synonymously

throughout this note. The social groups and elements included in this category

represent the demographic difference between the total Indian population

and all those whom we have described as the “elite”.’

The Subaltern historians made a radical departure in the use of the term from that of

Gramsci. Even while accepting the subordinated nature of the subaltern groups, they

argued the their history was autonomous from that of the dominant classes.

      

Now there is a general and clear acknowledgement of basically two phases in the

career of the Subaltern Studies. Phase I consists of :

a) concern with the subaltern, i.e., lower, exploited classes;

b) criticism of the elite, i.e., exploiting classes; and

c) influence of Gramscian thought and Marxist social history and an attempt to work

within broader Marxist theory.

In the second phase, there is a clear shift from these concerns. Now :

a) there is an increasing engagement with textual analysis, a shift away from exploring

the history of the exploited people, and more engagement, even though critical,

with elite discourses; and

b) Marx and Gramsci are jettisoned in favour of Michel Foucault, Edward Said, and

other postmodernists and postcolonialist.     The Subaltern Studies began in the early 1980s as a critique of the existing historiography which was accused by its initiators for ignoring the voice of the people. The writers associated with the project promised to offer a completely new kind of history in the field of Indian history.                                                                                                                                                                              

 

Subaltern hi hun rei tak atanga in tan tawh a ni a. A tirte ah chuan Middle Age hunlaiin England ah lonei mi te sawi nan a hman thin a ni. a hnu  kum 1700 chho ah chuan sipai pawla a dinhmun hniam ho sawi nan hman ani. Amaherawhchu, Antonio Gramsci(1891-1937) Italian Marxist leh Communist hruaitu chuan a rawn vawrh lar viau a. Gramsci hian 'subaltern' tih hi society a dinhmun hnuaihnung zawk sawi nan a hmang a ni.

Gramsci ngaihdanah chuan Subaltern ho chu thunei tu sang zawk te nen an in zawm tlat in a hria a ni. A sawi zawm zelna ah chuan Subaltern history hi a tlangpuiin  'a them bang leh thu sei tak kara a bung chang pawimawh lai pakhat ani'  a ti.

Ranajit  Guha chuan a lehkhabu, 'Studies of Subaltern' tih ah chuan, Gramsci ngaihdan ang chu a sawi lang tel miah lo a, mahse Gramsci chu Subaltern chungchanga phurna pe tu ani ati. Chu aia ah chuan Concise Oxford Dictionary a hrilhfiahna hi a tarlang zawk ani. Subaltern Concise Oxford Dictionary  a hrilhfiah danah chuan dinhmun hnuaihnung sawi nan a hmang a ni. A hnu ah, a essay ziah tawp lamah chuan 'mipui' tih leh 'subaltern class' tih hi awmze thuhmun rengin a hmang a ni. India ram population a mihring awmzat chhuina a mi naran rual awmho leh a dinhmun sang ho te danglamna a tarlang a ni. Subaltern historian te chuan Subaltern lo chhuahna bul chungchangah hian Gramsci ngaihdan hi an pawm tlang ani. Hetih rual hian subaltern te dinhmun chu ave reng turah an ngai a ni. 

Subaltern Studies ah hian adik nia pawmna  a awm a. Chungte chu Phase I leh Phase II a then ani. Phase I ah chuan: a)subaltern kaihhnawih, i.e., din hmun hniam zawkte leh an dinhmun antih chhiat te                                                                                                                       

b)din hmun sang zawk te sawiselna: i.e., dinhmun hniam zawk te ti chhe tu te                                                 

c)Gramsci ngaihdan pawmpuina leh Marxist Theory  a zau zawk a zir chian.

Subaltern Studies  hi kum 1980 ah a in tran a. Ziaktu te chuan Indian history a thil thar hlak pek an tiam a ni. 

                                                                                                                                                                               

                       References                                                                                                                            1)Vinayak Chaturvedi (ed.), Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial (London

and New York, Verso, 2000).

2)MHI-03 Historiography, IGNOU, MA Textbook                                                                                                                                                              

 

 

                      

                                                                     

 

IMPACT OF MARXISM{HISTORICAL MATERIALISM} ON HISTORIOGRAPHY LALNUNPUII R/N- 564

                     Karl marx was born in 1818 in Trier in Germany,the son of a lawyer.He studied law and jurisprudence at the University of Berlin,but took a keen interest in History and Philosophy also.Leaving university in 1841,he became a severe critic of the economic and political order of the day and soon had to leave the land of his birth to France,then to Belgium,and finally to England.He published numerous books during his lifetime,the most notable being ‘The Communist Manifesto{1848}’ and ‘Das Capital{18 7-1894}’.

                            The view of life and of history developed by Marx and Engel-indeed,what makes Marxism a unified,compelling and dynamic doctrine-is the philosophy of dialectical materialism.Dialectical materialism seeks the essence of the historical process in the changing material conditions of human life.

                             In the Holy Family,Marx and Engels had written that “history is nothing but the activity of man pursuing his aims”.The forces and relations of economic production determine the kind of religion,philosophies,governments,laws and moral rules men accept.This means that the basic causative factor in history is at all times the economic factor.

                            History is human society in dialectical motion.The dialectical motion is caused by the antagonistic interest of economic classes created by the prevailing mode of production.

                           In Das Capital Marx stated that the primary reason for the antagonism between labor and capital is that the capitalists are able to appropriate the surplus value created by labor and which,therefore,ought to go to labor.Marx declared labor to be to be the source of all wealth and the only source of value.

                           History is said to have been Marx’s weakest subject at the Trier High School.The German Historian Treitschke wrote that Marx “completely lacked a scholar’s conscience” and knew what he wanted to prove before the research started,an observation A.J.P. Taylor echoes when he said that “Marx…..decided beforehand what he wanted to discover……”.

                           Marx held that it was possible to establish laws of social enumerates Marx’s predictions that have not been borne out by facts.The proletariat did not grow progressively poorer-what Marx saw in the 184Os was only the early stage of industrial development.The contradictions within capitalism were overcome time after time.

                         A.J.P. Taylor has  written that because of the Communist Manifesto,”everyone thinks differently about politics and society,when he thinks at all”.The Marx-Engels scheme had in fact combined a critique of capitalism with a general theory of historical development.

IMPACT OF MARXISM IN MIZO:

Karl Marx hi ukil fapa niin kum 1818 May ningaah Trier khua,Germanyah alo pianga.Berlin Universityah danlam azira,mahse history leh Philosophyah atui em em thung a ni. Kum 1841ah University achawlhsana,an ram ei leh bar dinhmun leh an ram inrelbawl dan chu nasa taka sawiselin apianna ram chhuahsanin Franceah apema, chumi hnuah Belgiumah pem lehin, atawpah Englandah a inbengbel  ta a ni.A damlai hian lehkhabu tamtak ziakin, chungzinga chhinchhiahtlak tak tak te chu ‘Communist Manifesto[1848] leh Das Capital[18 7 to 1894]’ a ni.

                      Marx leh Engels-a khawvel thlirdan leh history tihmasawna, Marxism tipumkhattu, andoctrine tichak em em tu chu ‘Dialectical Materialism’ hi a ni. Dialectical Materialism sawifiah tum ber chu tisa thil a mihring  nundan phung lo danglam zelna hian history thil ati hmasawn a ni. ‘The Holy Family’ bu a Engels leh Marx-a ziah dan chuan ‘mihringin athil nih tum emaw athil tih tum azawnna dan hi history chu a ni’ anlo ti a ni. Tharum hmangin emaw inlaichinna tha tak hmanga kan ei leh bar dan hian kan sakhuanate, kan finnate, sawrkar kalphungte, leh kan dan leh dunte hi anghawng vek a ni. Hemi awmzia chu kan ei leh bar hi historya thil engemaw thlena awmtir bertu a ni. 

                 Society khata tawng emaw chindan bik kan neih hi history a ni a. He chindan bik kan neihna chhan ber chu ei leh bara kan duhdan inanlohna vang a kan innghirnghona atanga lo chhuak a ni. ‘Das Capital’ a Marx-a sawi dan chuan hlawhfate leh achhawrtute inremlohna lian ber chu hlawhchuang bang hlawhfatena ansiam leh anmahni hnena kal tur niawm tak capitalist ho-in an pumbilh vek thin chu a ni. Marx-a sawidan chuan hausakna zawng zawng leh ahlutna bul ber chu hlawhfate hi an ni ati a. 

                      History subject hi Marx-a Trier High School akal laia asubject tihchhiat ber ani tiin anlo sawi thin a. German Historian Treitschke ziah dan chuan ‘Marxa hian scholarin ahriattur niawma ngaih engmah ahrelova, research atih hmain enge afinfiahtur tih aruahman lawk vek thin’ ati bawk a ni. Marx-a ngaihdan chuan khawtlang hmasawn nan dan siam hi a siam theihin, chumi atang chuan khawtlang inthlakdanglamna asawi lawk a, Marxian dialect reng reng hi thil hrilhlawk atamin, thil thleng tawh leh thleng theiah a innghat nasa em em a ni. Chutihmeklaiin John Whittam-a chuan sawiselin Marx-a thil sawilawk reng reng hi asuangtuahna atang chauhva piang a ni ati ve thung a ni. MI hnuaihnungho hi anrethei reng kher lova, Marx-a hi chuan 184O’s chhova industry hmasawn chholai chiah ahmu a ni ati bawk a ni.AJP Taylor sawi dan chuan ‘The Communist Manifesto’ atlangzarh atang khan mi reng rengin society leh politics hi thil hrang hlak angin an ngai a,Marxa ngei pawn apawmdan  ang chiahin. Marx leh Engelsan an sawisel ber chu Capitalism theory hi a ni a, an rindan chuan mitin intluktlang a, nei bik leh neilo bik awm chuang lova inlungrualtaka society hi siam theihin anring a ni.

REFERENCES: Sreedharan E,”A Textbook of Historiography   5OO BC to AD 2OOO,Orient Blackswan Private Limited,2OO4

WHAT IS HISTORY LALCHHANDAMI,R/N-562

The origin of the word ‘History’ can be traced back to the Greek word ‘istoria’ meaning inquiry or research or ‘knowledge obtained as a result of inquiry’.History is mainly concerned with the activities of human beings.It is the study of events in man’s struggle for progress.In a broad sense history is a systematic account of the origin and development of human kind.

                                 History is the result of the interplay of man with his environment and with his fellowmen.Man has always expressed himself in terms of certain basic needs such as food,clothing and shelter,social and political organization,knowledge of his environment and transmission of such knowledge,self-expression,and religious and philosophical beliefs.Such activities together make up the universal culture pattern.

                                 When a people come to have a highly complex cultural pattern resting upon an intricate social organization and exerting wide control over nature,they may be said to have achieved what is called ‘civilization’.Civilization in all varied aspects constitutes the subject matter of history.

                                  History is the living past of man.It is the attempt made by man through centuries to reconstruct,describe and interpret his own past.

                                 “What is History” is a study of historiography that was written by the English Historian E.H.Carr.He argues that history should follow a middle-path,constituting a relationship “of equality,of give and take” between the Historian and their evidence.He remarks that Historian continuously moulds his facts to suit their interpretation and their interpretation to suit their facts,and takes part in a dialogue between past and present.Carr puts forward his own answer to the question of “What is History” that “it is a continuous process of interaction between the Historians and his facts,an unending dialogue between the past and the present.

                                       In the case of History many definitions have been given by many Scholars and Men of Letters.Although there are numerous definitions of History,the ultimate definition is yet to be arrived.Perhaps can never be.

WHAT IS HISTORY IN MIZO: History bul tan na chu Greek tawng ‘istoria’ atang hian a chhui theih awm e,a awmzia chu chikna emaw hriatchhuah tumna emaw chikna vanga hriatzauna kan neih hi.History chu mihring thiltih,hmasawn tuma theihtawp alo chhuah thin na chanchin a ni.Zau zawka kan thlir chuan History hi awmze neia mihring bul tanna leh hmasawn dan kan chhut hi a ni kan ti thei bawk ang.

                                        Mihring leh a chhehvel,midangte nena an in laichin tawnna in a rah chhuah chu History hi a ni.Mihring chu a thil mamawh hmangin amah a in lantir thin a,chungte chu chaw,thuamhnaw,inhumna,vantlang thil leh rorel dan,a chhehvel a hriatna leh a hriatna a hlan chhawn,mahni insawifiahna leh sakhaw chenin.Chutiang ang thiltih hrang hrang chuan hnam ziarang a siam ta thin a ni.

                                         Mipuiin hnam ziarang chipchiar taka alo hriat leh khuarel te chunga  thu a neih hian,hnam fing nihna chu alo nei ta tih in a sawitheih awm e.Hnam finna,a landan chi hrang hrang te chuan History ah pawimawhna a siam a ni.

                                         History chu hun liam tawha mihring lo khawsak dan thin hi a ni.Mihringin kumza tamtak kaltlanga alo tum tawh,siamthat te,sawifiah te leh mahni ngaihdan anga a hun liam tawh alo hril hi a ni.

                                       “What is History” thil hlui ziahdan zirna niin English Historian E.H.Carr a ziah a ni a.Historian leh a chianna inkarah History chu kalkawng lai taka kalin,in laichinna,intluk tlanna,lak leh pek,a siamin a din tur a ni tih chu a hnial a.Historian chuan thil nihna tak tak leh a ngaihdante a inmil tirin leh chu a ngaihdan chuan thil nihna tak tak chu a mil tur niin a sawi bawk.Engnge History chu tih chhanna chu ti hian a sawi,History chu historian leh thil nihna tak tak[facts] in khawihtawnna,hun kal tawh leh tun hun tawp lova a inbiak pawh rengna hi a ni tiin.

                                       History awmzia hi mi lehkhathiam leh ziakmi te chuan an sawi nasa hle a.History sawifiahna hi tamtak a awm nachungin,a tawp ber a History sawifiahna erawh a awm rih lo thung.A awm theilo maithei bawk a ni.

                       

REFERENCES:Jayapalan N,”Historiography”Atlantic Publishers and                                            Distributors[P]LTD,New Delhi,2O13

Sreedharan E,”A Textbook of Historiography   5OO BC to AD 2OOO,Orient Blackswan Private Limited,2OO4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Is_History%3F                  

Define Subaltern. How did Subaltern begin in India? * Laldingmawia Roll No - 1201 BA 543

Subaltern means the lower class or exploited section of society. The word was associated with India in ancient time but this word was also associated with the history of other countries too. In each and every year there is lower or exploited class, which was totally neglected by the history writers or history.

The society of this class was totally neglected by the government as well as society also. Ranajit Guha is called the father of "Subaltern Studies". The books published during his time were mostly named on it. The writers or historians of Subaltern want to show the position of lower class in world as well as to show the direction to up the condition of lower class in society.

The new thoughts were given with the writing of this historian. Indian historians formed a group and wrote their own thoughts. According to Guha, Subaltern history became much famous in India and also got success at international level. According to Guha what the history writes were away from the reality of lower class he argues that History should also writes, the viewpoint of lower class. There was bounded area for the lower class which had no relation with society as well as with politics evens their presence was also neglected.

The historians who were not happy with Congress nationalism formed a new area which was even not-founded. The area the study of lower class was first touched by Guha. He wrote on (tribes, peasants) also on middle also. Now people started to look towards the problem of the lower class. He gave a new direction to the writing. This writing was totally different from other historians.

The Subaltern Studies arose in the 1980s, influenced by the scholarship of Eric Strokes, to attempt to formulate a new narrative history of India and South Asia. Where previously the history modern India and particularly of the nationalists movement was etched as a history of Indian ‘elites. Subaltern history has now always had easy relationship with feminism.

   Subaltern sawifiah la, India-ah engtin nge alo in tan?

Subaltern chu khawtlanga mi hnuaihnung emaw hnuaichhiah an ni. He thu hian India hmalam nen pawh inzawmna a nei a, mahse hei hi ramdang history nen pawh a inzawm ve tho bawk. Kum tin hian mi hnuaihnung emaw hnuaichhiah hi an awm reng a, history ziaktu emaw history-ah hei hi hnawl a ni thin.

Hetianga mi hnuaihnung zawnkte hi sawkar bakah khawtlang pawhin an ngaihsak ngailo.  Subalterian Studies-a an pa koh ber chu Ranajit Guha a ni. A hunlaia lehkhabu a chhuah zawng zawng deuhthaw pawh hetiang mite lamhawi zawng vek hi a ni. Subaltern chungchang ziaktute’n tarlan an duhber chu mi hnuaihnung zawkte dinhmun a ni a, hei mai bakah hian khawtlangah dinhmun tha an chan theihna tur tarlan an duh thin.

He ngaihdan vang hian historian tam takin an ngaihsak a, an chanchin pawh an ziah phah reng a ni. Guha chuan Subaltern history hi India-ah chuan an hmelhriat hle a, khawvel pum huapah pawh a hlawhtling hle niin a sawi. Guha tho hian history tam tak chuan mi hnuaihnung zawkte an hmaih a, history ziah anih chuan he’ng mi hnuaihnungte dinhmun pawh hi a tel tur a ni tiin a sawi bawk. Mi hnuaihnung zawkte hi an in kilhtawihna a nasa em em thin a, khawltalng nen inkungkaihna an nei ngai lo va hei bakah hian politics-a an inrawlh ve pawh phal a nilo.

Congress nationalism-a lungawi lo historians thenkhat chuan bung thar an siam a mahse awmze nei thi erawh a nilo. Mi hnuaihnung zawkte chungchang tarlang hmasa bertu chu Guha a ni a, tribal leh kuthnathawktute dinhmun pawh a tarlang bawk. Tunah chuan mipuite’n mi hnuaihnung zawkte buaina an ngaihsak ve tan ta. Guha hian kawngdik an zawh theihna tur a kawhhmuh a, mahse a thuziahdan hi historian dangte ziahdan nen chuan a danglam daih thung.

India-ah chuan kum 1980 tir lamah khan Subalterian zirna hi alo in tan a, Eric Stroker-a zirtirna in a thlentir a ni. He zirna thar hian India leh Asia Hmar lam history sawidan phung thar tha zawk duan tumna lam a ni. A tirlamah chuan modern Indian history leh nationalist movement-te kha India history-a ropui lai ber niin sawi thin a ni. Subalterian history hi hmeichhe dinhmun chawisan tumna (feminism) nen pawh a inzawm nghal mai bawk a ni.

* References:

1). http://www.preservearticles.com/2012031627580/what-do-you-mean-by-subaltern-and-when-did-subaltern-studies-start-in-india.html 

2). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaltern_(postcolonialism) 

HISTORY AND OTHER DISCIPLINE Clement Zothanpuia Roll No - 1201 BA 537

These three subjects i.e History,Economics,Political science are closely connected with each other. They are influence and attached with each other. When a development or a decline happened in history of economics it effected the political or administrative system which leads to a change in the society or an empire during that period. That changed of event is what we studied in the subject of history.

HISTORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE :  Political science is closely related to History. According to John Seeley, “History is past politics and politics is present history”. A knowledge of history is very essential for any one in understanding the evolution of political institution. The great philosopher like Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli were able to derive their political ideas by mastering the history of political institution of the world. They in turn, gave a new outlook in history of politics.

There is close affinity between history and political science. To Sir John Seeley again, “History without political science has no fruit and Political science without History has no roots”. Action has said that, “the science of politics is the one science of deposited by the stream of history like grains of gold in the sand of river. The river itself is history, but politics deals with but part of it.

So, in short the two subject history and political science are like the two side of the same coin. “For all politics is not history as all history is not politics.

HISTORY AND ECONOMICS  : Economic is intimately connected with History just like political science. The two disciplines are inseperatable. The economic history of any period is an essential branches of history and its understanding is really important in understanding the history of any period.

Economics deals with things. Moreover it is concerned with the activities of man. History is the narration of events in the chronological order.

If anyone wants to have an idea of the role played by F.D.Roosevelt in American history, it is essential to go through the various economic measures undertaken by him during the period of Depression which is known as ‘New Deal’. From this, it is clear that history and economics are interrelated with one another.

Economics deals with production, distribution and consumption of wealth. There are various theories, which effect the functioning of society belonging to History.

In Modern times, scholars have come out with the economic interpretation of history which makes history and economics get closer. Karl Marx believed that all, religious, political and judicial development in history take place due to economic development.

Moreover, historical sources material like price structure, interest rate and wage level mentioned in ancient and medieval documents and inscription are immensely useful to the student of past economics.

The difference between history and economics lies in the approach towards the society. History is mainly concerned with the events. But economics attached importance to  things and their value.

CONCLUSION :   To conclude this, history, economics and political science are closely connected with each other. When we look at the history of the decline of many great ruler in the ancient and medieval period. We can clearly sees that there is a fall in their economic system which lead  to mis-government. And when the government was not in apposition of administering the society, the empire will fall. That decline or changes is what we studied in history.

          HISTORY AND OTHER DISCIPLINED (MIZO)

HISTORY LEH POLITICAL SCIENCE: History leh political science hi an inzawm nghet em em a. John Seeleya’n a sawi dan chuan,“ History chu politics a thil thleng tawh a ni a, tin politics chu history thleng mek a ni. History hriat chian na hi tu tan pawh a pawimawh em em a chu chuan political institution a thil lo thlen chhoh dan hriat thiam theih na min pe a ni. Philosopher ropui tak tak Plato te,Aristotle te leh Machiavelli te khan politics a an ngaihdan ropui tak tak lo chhuak tur khan political institution history kha uluk takin an zir hmasa phawt a ni. Chu chuan politics history ah ngaihdan thar a siam chhuah tir theih phah a ni.

History leh political science te hi anin zawm thuk em em a. Sir John Seeley-a sawi dan dang leh ah chuan,” history telloh na political science chu thei rah chhuah tur nei lo ang a ni a, political science tellova history chu thingkung zung nei lo ang a ni. Action-a sawi dan chuan politics chu, “ science peng pakhat history in asiam tuipui kam tiau a rangkachak awm ang hi ani a. Chu luipui chu history hi a ni a, politics chu a peng pakhatte zing a mi a ni.

A tawi thei ang ber a sawi dawn chuan history leh political science chu pawisa thir a leh lam leh lam ang hi a ni. Politics zawng zawng hi history a ni lova, tiang chiah hian history zawng zawng hi politics ani hek lo.

HISTORY AND ECONOMICS : History leh economics te hi political science kan sawi ang chiah khan inzawm tlat then hran theih loh a ni a. Engtik hun pawh a economic history chu history zirna a bung pawimawh tak a ni a. Economic history hriat thiam chuan engtik hun lai pawh a history a hriat thiam theihna a nia a pawimawh hle a ni.

Economic chuan engkim a huam a, hemi zingah hian mihring inrawhna pawh a tel bawk a ni.History erawh chu thil thleng chhinchhiahna a ni.

American history a F.D.Roosevelt a thil tih kan hriat theihna tur chuan depression hun lai a economic measures a kal tlangpui dan hriat a ngaia hei hi New Deal a ni. Hemi atang hian economics leh history te hi an in zawm dun tlat a ni tih kan hre thei a ni.

Economics chu siamchhuah, hmanral leh semdarh chungchang s ni a. Zirtirna tam tak history beh chhan a inzirtirna khawtlang nghawng thei pawh a tam hle a ni.

Tunlai hun ah chuan mithiam ten history zulin economic an sawifiah a. Hei hian economic leh history a in hnaih tir phah hle ani. Karl marx chuan history a engkim,sakhuana,political leh dan lama hmasawnna te hi economic hmasawnna in a ken tel vek ni in a ngai a ni.

History hriatna tur a bungraw thenkhat  price structure,interest rate leh wage level tunhma lam leh tunhnai a sawilan bakah thuziak awm te pawh in tunhma economics zirtan a tangkai hle a ni.

History leh economics danglamna chu khawtlang a nghawng a neih ahte a ni a. History chuan atlangpuiin thil thleng bik lam a kaih hnawih a, mahse economics chuan thil hlutna a tarlang thung.

CONCLUSION : A khaikhawm nan chuan History leh economics leh political science te hi in hniah tak mai a ni a. Economy tlak chhiat vang a sawrkar tlachhia an awm tih chiang tak in a hmuh theih a, chu chuan politics leh administration kal phung a tlak chiat tir a chu chuan lalram ropui tak pawh tlakchhiat na athlen a ni. Chu tlakchhiat na tak chu history a kan zir a chu a ni.

* References:

1). http://www.answers.com/Q/Relationship_between_political_science_and_history 

2). http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_relationship_of_history_to_economics

3). Historiography, Jayapalan N, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 1999.

HISTORY AND OTHER DISCIPLINE L. Thuamrohluna Roll No - 1201 BA 541

These three subjects i.e History,Economics,Political science are closely connected with each other. They are influence and attached with each other. When a development or a decline happened in history of economics it effected the political or administrative system which leads to a change in the society or an empire during that period. That changed of event is what we studied in the subject of history.

HISTORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE :  Political science is closely related to History. According to John Seeley, “History is past politics and politics is present history”. A knowledge of history is very essential for any one in understanding the evolution of political institution. The great philosopher like Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli were able to derive their political ideas by mastering the history of political institution of the world. They in turn, gave a new outlook in history of politics.

There is close affinity between history and political science. To Sir John Seeley again, “History without political science has no fruit and Political science without History has no roots”. Action has said that, “the science of politics is the one science of deposited by the stream of history like grains of gold in the sand of river. The river itself is history, but politics deals with but part of it.

So, in short the two subject history and political science are like the two side of the same coin. “For all politics is not history as all history is not politics.

HISTORY AND ECONOMICS  : Economic is intimately connected with History just like political science. The two disciplines are inseperatable. The economic history of any period is an essential branches of history and its understanding is really important in understanding the history of any period.

Economics deals with things. Moreover it is concerned with the activities of man. History is the narration of events in the chronological order.

If anyone wants to have an idea of the role played by F.D.Roosevelt in American history, it is essential to go through the various economic measures undertaken by him during the period of Depression which is known as ‘New Deal’. From this, it is clear that history and economics are interrelated with one another.

Economics deals with production, distribution and consumption of wealth. There are various theories, which effect the functioning of society belonging to History.

In Modern times, scholars have come out with the economic interpretation of history which makes history and economics get closer. Karl Marx believed that all, religious, political and judicial development in history take place due to economic development.

Moreover, historical sources material like price structure, interest rate and wage level mentioned in ancient and medieval documents and inscription are immensely useful to the student of past economics.

The difference between history and economics lies in the approach towards the society. History is mainly concerned with the events. But economics attached importance to  things and their value.

CONCLUSION :   To conclude this, history, economics and political science are closely connected with each other. When we look at the history of the decline of many great ruler in the ancient and medieval period. We can clearly sees that there is a fall in their economic system which lead  to mis-government. And when the government was not in apposition of administering the society, the empire will fall. That decline or changes is what we studied in history.

                      HISTORY AND OTHER DISCIPLINED (MIZO)

HISTORY LEH POLITICAL SCIENCE: History leh political science hi an inzawm nghet em em a. John Seeleya’n a sawi dan chuan,“ History chu politics a thil thleng tawh a ni a, tin politics chu history thleng mek a ni. History hriat chian na hi tu tan pawh a pawimawh em em a chu chuan political institution a thil lo thlen chhoh dan hriat thiam theih na min pe a ni. Philosopher ropui tak tak Plato te,Aristotle te leh Machiavelli te khan politics a an ngaihdan ropui tak tak lo chhuak tur khan political institution history kha uluk takin an zir hmasa phawt a ni. Chu chuan politics history ah ngaihdan thar a siam chhuah tir theih phah a ni.

History leh political science te hi anin zawm thuk em em a. Sir John Seeley-a sawi dan dang leh ah chuan,” history telloh na political science chu thei rah chhuah tur nei lo ang a ni a, political science tellova history chu thingkung zung nei lo ang a ni. Action-a sawi dan chuan politics chu, “ science peng pakhat history in asiam tuipui kam tiau a rangkachak awm ang hi ani a. Chu luipui chu history hi a ni a, politics chu a peng pakhatte zing a mi a ni.

A tawi thei ang ber a sawi dawn chuan history leh political science chu pawisa thir a leh lam leh lam ang hi a ni. Politics zawng zawng hi history a ni lova, tiang chiah hian history zawng zawng hi politics ani hek lo.

HISTORY AND ECONOMICS : History leh economics te hi political science kan sawi ang chiah khan inzawm tlat then hran theih loh a ni a. Engtik hun pawh a economic history chu history zirna a bung pawimawh tak a ni a. Economic history hriat thiam chuan engtik hun lai pawh a history a hriat thiam theihna a nia a pawimawh hle a ni.

Economic chuan engkim a huam a, hemi zingah hian mihring inrawhna pawh a tel bawk a ni.History erawh chu thil thleng chhinchhiahna a ni.

American history a F.D.Roosevelt a thil tih kan hriat theihna tur chuan depression hun lai a economic measures a kal tlangpui dan hriat a ngaia hei hi New Deal a ni. Hemi atang hian economics leh history te hi an in zawm dun tlat a ni tih kan hre thei a ni.

Economics chu siamchhuah, hmanral leh semdarh chungchang s ni a. Zirtirna tam tak history beh chhan a inzirtirna khawtlang nghawng thei pawh a tam hle a ni.

Tunlai hun ah chuan mithiam ten history zulin economic an sawifiah a. Hei hian economic leh history a in hnaih tir phah hle ani. Karl marx chuan history a engkim,sakhuana,political leh dan lama hmasawnna te hi economic hmasawnna in a ken tel vek ni in a ngai a ni.

History hriatna tur a bungraw thenkhat  price structure,interest rate leh wage level tunhma lam leh tunhnai a sawilan bakah thuziak awm te pawh in tunhma economics zirtan a tangkai hle a ni.

History leh economics danglamna chu khawtlang a nghawng a neih ahte a ni a. History chuan atlangpuiin thil thleng bik lam a kaih hnawih a, mahse economics chuan thil hlutna a tarlang thung.

CONCLUSION : A khaikhawm nan chuan History leh economics leh political science te hi in hniah tak mai a ni a. Economy tlak chhiat vang a sawrkar tlachhia an awm tih chiang tak in a hmuh theih a, chu chuan politics leh administration kal phung a tlak chiat tir a chu chuan lalram ropui tak pawh tlakchhiat na athlen a ni. Chu tlakchhiat na tak chu history a kan zir a chu a ni.

* References:

1). http://www.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_relationship_of_history_to_economics

2).  http://www.shareyouressays.com/89023/relationship-between-political-science-and-history-essay 

3).  http://www.answers.com/Q/Relationship_between_political_science_and_history 

4). Historiography, Jayapalan N. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 1999.